Accuracy Isn’t a Claim. It’s a Commitment.
In home health, accuracy is not a marketing metric. It’s the foundation of compliance, reimbursement, and trust between agencies, clinicians, and the patients they serve.
At Olli Health, we’ve always believed that if accuracy truly matters, it should be measured rigorously and shared transparently. Too often in healthcare technology, vendors rely on vague claims or cherry-picked benchmarks that don’t reflect real production performance. That’s not how we operate.
Instead, we built our platform and our internal processes around a simple principle: accuracy should be engineered, validated, and openly reported.
Designing for Better-Than-Human Accuracy
From the beginning, our goal was not simply to automate coding or speed up documentation workflows. It was to design systems that consistently outperform traditional manual processes while maintaining full clinical rigor.
Achieving that required more than just AI. It required:
Clinician-led system design
Structured and rigorous quality validation processes
Continuous quality monitoring
Experienced QA oversight
Every component of the Olli platform is built to support these goals. Our models assist with coding and OASIS review, but the system is designed around layered quality controls that ensure outputs meet the same standards expected from senior clinical reviewers.
Technology alone isn’t enough. The real differentiator is how you validate performance in production environments.
Our Commitment to Transparent QA
To ensure our partners always know exactly how we’re performing, Olli runs rigorous internal quality assurance reviews on live production charts.
Our most recent review examined performance across a large real-world sample:
Date Range: November 1, 2025 – February 1, 2026
Sample Size: 913 QA'd charts
Agencies Served: 100+ home health organizations serving 200,000+ patients
The results:
Coding Accuracy: 97%
OASIS Accuracy: 99%
Plan of Care Accuracy: 99%
These aren’t theoretical benchmarks or controlled lab results. They reflect real production performance across real agencies and real patient charts.
A Clinician-Led QA Process
Accuracy measurement only matters if the evaluation itself is rigorous.
Our QA process is led by a team of experienced home health clinicians who bring deep industry expertise to every review.
Our quality reviewers include registered nurses with more than 10 years of senior-level experience in coding, quality review, and QA leadership at organizations such as McBee, Corridor, and Amedisys. All members of the team hold HCS-D and HCS-O certifications, ensuring that our validation standards align with the highest professional benchmarks in home health coding and OASIS review.
This clinician-led process continuously evaluates production results, flags potential improvement areas, and feeds those learnings back into our system design.
The goal is simple: continuous improvement and transparent reporting.
Accuracy Without the Traditional Tradeoffs
Historically, agencies have had to choose between three competing priorities:
Accuracy
Speed
Cost
Traditional outsourcing vendors often deliver high accuracy but at significant cost and turnaround time. Manual internal review processes can also create bottlenecks that slow down operations.
Olli was built to eliminate this tradeoff.
Our platform delivers:
Better-than-human accuracy
4× faster turnaround times
A fraction of the cost of traditional coding vendors
This allows agencies to improve compliance and documentation quality while reducing operational burden on clinicians and back-office teams.
Why Transparency Matters
Accuracy claims are easy to make. Demonstrating them consistently is much harder.
That’s why we believe transparency should be standard in healthcare technology. Agencies deserve to know exactly how their partners perform.
By openly sharing our QA results and methodology, we’re doing two things:
Holding ourselves accountable to the highest standards
Giving our partners confidence in the systems they rely on
Accuracy, transparency, and accountability aren’t optional add-ons. They are core components of the service we provide.
What This Means for Home Health Agencies
For agencies navigating staffing shortages, reimbursement pressure, and increasing documentation complexity, reliable coding and OASIS review is more important than ever.
With Olli, agencies gain:
Consistently high accuracy validated through clinician-led QA
Faster chart turnaround times
Lower operational costs
Full transparency into system performance
Most importantly, they gain a partner that treats accuracy as a responsibility, not a slogan.
See the Results for Yourself
We’re proud of the systems we’ve built and the outcomes they’re delivering for our partners.
If you’d like to see how Olli performs with your agency’s charts, we offer low-risk pilot programs that allow you to evaluate the results directly within your workflow.
Because the best proof of accuracy isn’t a claim.
It’s the results.
